Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Mature Content Filter is On
(Contains: ideologically sensitive material)
Germany, Russia, the United States, and Britain, all allied, all dystopic.

How could the world end up under the prying eyes of these four gargantuan states?

The point of departure from OTL is more of a cluster of differences, all during the Napoleonic Wars; amongst smaller things, the Americans gain full control of the Lousiana Purchase, Francis II never dissolves the Holy Roman Empire and rather effectively stalls out the French in central Germany (not forever) Tsar Alexander I of Russia is forced from Saint Petersburg by Napoleon after Polotsk is a Russian loss, America joins the fight against the French in Europe and in North America, and lastly Napoleon successfully launches an invasion of England (not victorious, but it brings the Coalition to the negotiating table).

At said negotiating table in Magdeburg, Napoleon is assassinated by a contingent of Prussian and Austrian soldiers, those left in power of the Napoleonic realm are suddenly under renewed assault, and the war ends in a blood grind across the French countryside until Paris is pulverized to the point that the catacombs beneath can be seen from above.

From 1817, the butterflies flap. The longer and bloodier war led to the renunciation of Orthodox Christianity as the state religion of the Russian Empire, with a new, Slavic faith ariving only comparable to OTL LaVeyan Satanism, the case being that the rapidly liberalizing Russian government and the people couldn't believe God could allow such violence.

In the Holy Roman Empire, a dual centralization begins from the north and the south, with an unprecedented alliance between Prussia and Austria eventually leading to dynastic union, political union, and the sudden realization that by the mid-1850's the House of Hapsburg-Hohenzollern had established a hereditary and autocratic imperial dynasty over the Empire (which by then had dropped the Holy Roman, and was now officially called the Empire of the German Nation).


In Britain, reactionary attitudes amongst the populace led to the election of a similarly reactionary government; thus progress went slowly, almost fascistically, with universal suffrage only for white citizens and Asiatics by 1912; coloreds (Africans and Native Americans are 'serfs' working for industrial and agricultural combines across the federal and socialistic British Imperial Federation.)

Meanwhile in the United States of America, a continued sense of jingoistic expansion and frontier culture soon fermented itself at the pinnacle of American fundamentals, and like its British mother America was also raciall stratified; Although legally free, Asiatics such as the Japanese and Indians built the railroads and canals of the west, served as soldiers during the Mexican, Centralian, and Colombian Wars, and were thus granted suffrage under the watchful eyes of their Caucasian overlords. They voted for the single Union Party, because it was the only party, not because it had no competition, simply because the competition had no real support base. Prussian militarism, Austrian administration (better here, if violent at times), and Russian zealousness characterized the American people.


Although these nations reacted to the horrors of the Napoleonic Wars differently, they all stood aside one another in an unofficial alliance that ran the world. Colonialism, the white mans burden, and the rise of the modern era brought with it nationalism, socialism, and advances in technology unparelled by any other point in history. By 1900 the world was carved up into vast empires and the old order was falling; first the Ottomans, then even the Chinese, the oldest of the nations!

Either side of the global power system needed to strike first, because that which won would go forth to enforce conservative dominance on the New World Order.

Unfortunately for Napoleons heirs and their few allies, they could not match the raw power of the reigning Quadrarchy, and although not crushed into powder, found themselves suddenly sidelined into nonexistence, territories and colonies taken, the regime collapsing for years on end before reconsolidation, and the only thing saving them, oddly enough, was the fact that the reigning German Kaiser, poised in negotiations to completely dismember eastern France and render the very nation unsustainable, died. His rather... Americanized daughter thus took over as Kaiserin, and recognizing the corrupt and adhoc system ruling the German Nation from Prague, was lenient on Le Empereur.

Purging corruption and centralizing power in the style of an enlightened monarch, the new Kaiserin valiantly transformed the nation through force into a burgeoning social democracy. But altogether she was still an autocrat, and when the Bavarian and Hungarian nobles rebelled as the corrupt Imperial system disappeared after the war, they were crushed under jackboot and treads, to the general roar of German crowds.

Now things are tense. The Kaiserin and the Tsar grow closer, two forms of radical atheism and autocratic might converging across continents, and in a bedroom.

The Americans and British find it uneasy, especially with rumors of a Russo-German political and dynastic union. The idea of a Eurasian Empire as centralized and powerful as their own suddenly ruling 1/3rd of the world is unsettling.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconmdc01957:
mdc01957 Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012
It looks like the Greeks also expanded as well...though how bad are THEY? ;)
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Nationalist, "absorb all teh landz" kinda bad. Which isn't so bad. But they are kinda stern folks. And hairy.
Reply
:iconmdc01957:
mdc01957 Featured By Owner Nov 12, 2012
Could be worse...
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 12, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
They aren't Classicalist, if that's what you mean :P
Reply
:iconmdc01957:
mdc01957 Featured By Owner Nov 13, 2012
What other countries am I missing here? ^^
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 13, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
I updated, so look and ask :P
Reply
:iconmdc01957:
mdc01957 Featured By Owner Nov 13, 2012
So...the Ottoman Empire's gone and the Dutch are all over the place?
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 13, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
The Ottoman state still exists as a tiny rump puppet state, demilitarized, neutralized, not allowed to have any foreign policy aside from trade agreements, and most of its industry and agriculture is owned by Greek and Russian firms.

And yes, the Dutch imvested in colonies OTL they never expanded, and rely less on the East Indies for their power base. Losing any one colony would be a big blow, but not one they couldn't recover from, and they can kick some serious ass.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:icongigoxxiii:
GigoXXIII Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Sweet Jesus, I think I'm living in the wrong world XD (Joking)
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Which country is that? :P
Reply
:icongigoxxiii:
GigoXXIII Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
RL New Zealand, a nice countrie but its tiny and boaring.
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
New Zealand is part of the Australasian dominion of the British Empire :P

Pretty much an empire within an Empire, since they control most of the Pacific islands south of the equator.
Reply
:icongigoxxiii:
GigoXXIII Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I'm kind of anoyed that in RL New Zealand and Australia never merged. We have differences such as the treaty of waitangi and some other minor differences but all in all both countries would be stonger and richer united even if Australia dominated.

I'v noticed India is not British in this TL, how did that happen ?
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
India is apart of the British Empire ITTL, I am just using my second Southron map as a base template to work from, and most of the world is unedited. India will be a bunch of domiminions, princely states, or outright easier to handle colonial territories (or perhaps provinces?) by the time I finish editing it. Here, I haven't touched it yet. Although I am already thinking ahead on how to divide it up into an easier to handle goliath that will still be "British".
Reply
:icongigoxxiii:
GigoXXIII Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I'm suprised that in RL the British never tried to turn into into several dominions, it would keep the Indians happy (possiblely), reduce some of the religous tensions and if applyed with devide and conquer might have caused strong regionalism to develop weakening Indian nationalism.

I assume that they feared the British Empire becoming and Indian Empire which was highly unlikely.

Whats the German Congo/Central Africa like, is it better or worse then the Belgian Congo ?
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Better off, because the Germans only have that one enormous colony and smaller, tiny outposts to pump funds into and extract from. The Germans divided the tribal folks and employ them to help extract resources, build up internal divisions but keep them all pro-German. I imagined the French to have owned it beforehand, so switching from French Congo horrors to management smilar to OTL German East Africa would be a nice switch and boost pro-German consensus.

So yes, better off then Belgian Congo.


As for India, splitting it up into separate, regional dominions partly based off the Presidencies of the Raj and on ethnic and religious divisions on a secular, British Western framework is what I am going for. It won't be ENTIRELY dominions, because ITTL there was no Indian Mutiny so the Mughal Emperor is still nominally ruler of all India (de jure), some areas that were larger, more modernized princely states will survive as fiefs of the Dominions, other places like Orissa will be colonies, and places like Goa will either remain apart of their respective colonial powers or annexed directly as provinces of the British realm.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconlamnay:
lamnay Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2012
What's up with Bavaria?
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Bavaria was an independent part of the German Union, but during the last big war with France both it AND Hungary rebelled in a bid for more actual independence and to get out of suzerainty of the Austro-Prussians.

They were pretty much destroyed after a very long guerrilla attempt at freeing themselves, now they are under marshal law.
Reply
:iconlamnay:
lamnay Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012
Oh I see.
Reply
:icongoliath-maps:
Goliath-Maps Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2012
Why does it say this is mature content?
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
I always put them as ideologically sensitive because nationalist dA users bitch about everything if I just so happen to change the border of the country for the worse.
Reply
:icongroenbjerg:
groenbjerg Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2012
Ggggh. Too true. Arg.


This is intriguing. Love to know how South America got that way...
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
I am constructing this map using my Southron template, so South America doesn't look like that aside from the American portions and the possibility of a Portuguese Amazon.
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
*of their country
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
November 10, 2012
Image Size
579 KB
Resolution
4500×2234
Submitted with
Sta.sh
Mature Content
Yes
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
388
Favourites
10 (who?)
Comments
66
Downloads
12
×